LI Rongwu ZHAO Weijuan LI Guoxia XIE Jianzhong GUOMin ZHANG Bin WU Xiaoli YAO Guifang GAO Zhengyao FENG Songlin HUANG Zhongxiang JIA Xiuqin. A study on provenance relation between Jiaotanxia ancient Guan porcelain and Qinliangsi ancient Ru porcelain by NAA[J]. Nuclear techniques, 2004, (8): 576-580.
LI Rongwu ZHAO Weijuan LI Guoxia XIE Jianzhong GUOMin ZHANG Bin WU Xiaoli YAO Guifang GAO Zhengyao FENG Songlin HUANG Zhongxiang JIA Xiuqin. A study on provenance relation between Jiaotanxia ancient Guan porcelain and Qinliangsi ancient Ru porcelain by NAA[J]. Nuclear techniques, 2004, (8): 576-580.DOI:
A study on provenance relation between Jiaotanxia ancient Guan porcelain and Qinliangsi ancient Ru porcelain by NAA
11 samples of ancient Chinese Ru porcelain from Qingliangsi kiln
23 samples of ancient Chinese Guan porcelain from Jiaotanxia kiln and 4 samples of modern archaized Guan porcelain were obtained to determine the contents of elements in each of them by neutron activation analysis (NAA). The NAA data were further analyzed using fuzzy cluster analysis to obtain the fuzzy cluster trend diagrams for the bodies samples and the glazes samples respectively. The analysis shows that the raw material origins of the Jiaotanxia ancient Chinese Guan porcelain bodies samples are very concentrated; those of the Qingliangsi ancient Chinese Ru porcelain bodies samples are a little dispersed; those of ancient Chinese Guan porcelain glazes samples are relatively concentrated; those of ancient Chinese Ru porcelain glazes samples are dispersed; and the origins of the raw material of ancient Chinese Guan porcelain glazes samples are obviously different from those of ancient Chinese Ru porcelain glazes samples. The bodies samples and glazes samples of Jiaotanxia ancient Chinese Guan porcelain and those of Qingliangsi ancient Chinese Ru porcelain have some difference but can be compared with each other.